Monday 2 November 2015

Indirect Speech for Future Perfect Tense

Indirect Speech for Future Perfect Tense

Indirect Speech for Future Perfect Tense
Photo Source: www.slideshare.net
Today in the Final Class of Direct and Indirect Speech, we are going to learn the Indirect Speech of Future Perfect Tense. It's very easy to convert a Future Perfect tense sentence to the Indirect speech because unlike Other tenses, we do not make big changes in the Direct speech of Future Perfect Tense.
Don't miss: Indirect Speech for future continuous & Future simple Tense.
When we Convert the direct Speech of Future Perfect to Indirect speech we mostly make changes in the helping verb of the direct speech, The helping verb 'will have' will change into 'would have' while the main verb will remain Past Participle.
The Inverted Commas of the Reporting speech will be replaced with the word 'That'.
No Comma or Inverted comma will take place in the Indirect (reported speech).
The Pronouns and the Particular worlds will change as per the rules of direct and indirect speech.

For Example:
Direct Speech: Mr.White said. "we will have to catch the Fishes in the sea".
Reported/Indirect Speech: Mr.white said that they would have to catch the Fishes in the sea.

Direct Speech: She said. "I will have reached the University early in the morning".
Indirect Speech: She said that she would have to reach the university early in the morning.

Direct Speech: He said, "we will not have served the nation for twenty years".
Indirect Speech: He said that they would not have served the nation for twenty years.

Direct Speech: Alizbath said, "I will have Eaten all the delicious dishes".
Indirect Speech: Alizbath said that she would have eaten all the delicious dishes.

Direct Speech: They said, "We will have confirmed Her home Adress or phone number".
Indirect Speech: They said that they would have confirmed her home address or Phone number.

Direct Speech: Mccallum said, "They will have scored enough runs to defend the match".
Indirect Speech: Mccallum said that they would have scored enough runs to defend the match.

2 comments: